Investigating Moran’s I Properties for Spatial Machine Learning: A Preliminary Analysis
Jakub Nowosad
Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Heisenbergstraße 2, Münster, 48149, Germany
Institute of Geoecology and Geoinformation, Adam Mickiewicz University, B. Krygowskiego 10, Poznań, 61-680, Poland
Hanna Meyer
Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Heisenbergstraße 2, Münster, 48149, Germany
Related authors
Jakub Nowosad
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W12-2024, 127–133, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-127-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-127-2024, 2024
J. Nowosad, T. F. Stepinski, and M. Iwicki
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W1-2022, 337–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-337-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-337-2022, 2022
Bettina Haas, Maiken Baumberger, Adina Rauscher, Johanna Kaucher, Werner Borken, Hanna Meyer, and Nele Meyer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5959, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5959, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).
Short summary
Short summary
SOC mineralization up to 1 m depth was investigated across forest, grassland, and cropland soils in the Fichtelgebirge Mountains, Germany. Soil samples were incubated under in situ conditions of temperature and moisture. Incubation under standardized conditions was performed to assess SOC stability. SOC stability declined with depth. Mineralization at in situ conditions declined with depth only in croplands. No clear seasonal patterns in mineralization were observed in either topsoil or subsoil.
Fabian Lukas Schumacher, Christian Knoth, Marvin Ludwig, and Hanna Meyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 10185–10202, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-10185-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-10185-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Machine learning is increasingly used in environmental sciences for spatial predictions, but its effectiveness is challenged when models are applied beyond the areas they were trained on. We propose a Local Training Data Point Density (LPD) approach that considers how well a model's environment is represented by training data. This method provides a valuable tool for evaluating model applicability and uncertainties, crucial for broader scientific and practical applications.
Carles Milà, Marvin Ludwig, Edzer Pebesma, Cathryn Tonne, and Hanna Meyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6007–6033, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6007-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6007-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Spatial proxies, such as coordinates and distances, are often used as predictors in random forest models for predictive mapping. In a simulation and two case studies, we investigated the conditions under which their use is appropriate. We found that spatial proxies are not always beneficial and should not be used as a default approach without careful consideration. We also provide insights into the reasons behind their suitability, how to detect them, and potential alternatives.
Jan Linnenbrink, Carles Milà, Marvin Ludwig, and Hanna Meyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5897–5912, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5897-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Estimation of map accuracy based on cross-validation (CV) in spatial modelling is pervasive but controversial. Here, we build upon our previous work and propose a novel, prediction-oriented k-fold CV strategy for map accuracy estimation in which the distribution of geographical distances between prediction and training points is taken into account when constructing the CV folds. Our method produces more reliable estimates than other CV methods and can be used for large datasets.
Jakub Nowosad
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W12-2024, 127–133, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-127-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-127-2024, 2024
J. Nowosad, T. F. Stepinski, and M. Iwicki
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W1-2022, 337–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-337-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-337-2022, 2022
M. Ludwig, J. Bahlmann, E. Pebesma, and H. Meyer
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 135–141, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-135-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-135-2022, 2022