<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AGILE-GISS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>AGILE: GIScience Series</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AGILE-GISS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">AGILE GIScience Ser.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2700-8150</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/agile-giss-7-12-2026</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>OpenStreetMap Suitability Analysis for Wheelchair Routing</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Majic</surname>
<given-names>Ivan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gegenleithner</surname>
<given-names>Thomas</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Scholz</surname>
<given-names>Johannes</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Working Group Geoinformation, Institute of Geodesy, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<elocation-id>12</elocation-id>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Ivan Majic et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://agile-giss.copernicus.org/articles/agile-giss-7-12-2026.html">This article is available from https://agile-giss.copernicus.org/articles/agile-giss-7-12-2026.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://agile-giss.copernicus.org/articles/agile-giss-7-12-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://agile-giss.copernicus.org/articles/agile-giss-7-12-2026.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Navigation and wayfinding are essential for modern mobility and are readily available for vehicles and pedestrians. However, the process can be more challenging for wheelchair users, as the availability of suitable services may be limited. This study investigates the suitability of OpenStreetMap (OSM) for wheelchair navigation. The primary goal is to identify OSM tags (i.e., key-value combinations) that are particularly relevant for wheelchair users. Previous research has shown that the street type, surface, gradient, and barriers are particularly challenging factors for wheelchair navigation and are therefore analyzed in more detail here. Particular emphasis is placed on analyzing pavement conditions and the related challenges in urban infrastructure. Additionally, an area of interest in the city of Graz is selected for a detailed analysis and case study. Another aspect of this work focuses on generating a network specifically for wheelchair users using open-source data and tools. This study highlights the distinctions between pedestrian and wheelchair navigation and demonstrates this quantitatively by comparing their respective routes for numerous origin-destination pairs. Additionally, a performance evaluation is conducted on the established wheelchair network.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8c3vf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;img src="https://contentmanager.copernicus.org/779365/10/locale/ssl" width="150px" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Reproducibility review available at: &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8c3vf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8c3vf&lt;/a&gt;</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="22"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>
